A lot of press is given to the impact that the Voter ID legislation
on the destruction the democratic process in the United States – by removing
tens of millions of people from having the ability to vote.
Another part of the Voter ID impact that seems to get
overlooked is the cost.
It is important to remember that the ALEC and their
members have historically wanted to eliminate “heart strings legislation” – as noted in a speech by
then ALEC President Bonnie Cooper in 1997.
“Heart strings legislation” refers to the use of tax dollars for social
programs - taxpayer dollars that help the common good.
Based on past experience – ALEC would prefer that your
tax dollars are spent to increase the profits of their Corporate Profit Sector
members – through privatization – rather than use those tax dollars for the
common good. I guess you could surmise
that if ALEC profit sector members can’t have the money – ALEC believes that no one should have access
to taxpayer dollars – so, just waste taxpayer dollars, through uselss, nasty ALEC "model" legislation, like Voter ID.
According to ALEC, government should spend important tax dollars on useless legislation –
therefore it is not available for that horrible “heartstrings legislation”, so hated by ALEC.
In 2011, Republicans have proposed
photo ID legislation in at least 35 states even though these states collectively
face over $98 billion in budget shortfalls in the upcoming fiscal year.2 As
demonstrated in Indiana – the first state to enact a photo identification
regime – these bills are extremely expensive; in just four years, Indiana spent
more than $10 million on providing identification cards alone.
In order to estimate the real cost
of photo ID legislation, we analyzed the actual costs of implementing photo ID
regimes in Indiana and Georgia alongside average costs predicted in 17 state
fiscal notes. We found that if each of
these 35 states enacts photo ID legislation, taxpayers across the country will
pay at least $276 million and up to $828 million for this unnecessary
legislation.
State budgets are zero-sum games – a dollar
spent on photo ID necessarily means one less for education and public safety.
This waste of taxpayer dollars is even more stark when
you consider a report that was released on Tuesday about the occurrence of
voter ID fraud which states (my emphasis):
Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter
impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during
that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million
prospective voters.
“Voter fraud at the polls is an
insignificant aspect of American elections,” said elections expert David
Schultz, professor of public policy at Hamline University School of Business in
St. Paul.
“There is absolutely no evidence
that [voter impersonation fraud] has affected the outcome of any election in
the United States, at least any recent election in the United States,” Schultz
said.
Civil-rights and voting-rights activists condemn the ID laws as a way
of disenfranchising minorities, students, senior citizens and the disabled.
I think we also need to condemn these American
Legislative Exchange Council Voter ID laws a theft of taxpayer dollars from
supposedly “fiscally responsible” Republicans. Taxpayer dollars that could be used for the public good - instead of destroying the US democratic process.
No comments:
Post a Comment