Pages

Thursday, February 20, 2014

There is NO Evidence Kirk Dillard quit ALEC.

An update to my post yesterday


Want to get this on the search engines.
Dillard's letter is a sham - another piece of misleading information handed out to the press and public -  by a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council - evidently, they can't tell the truth, unless a lobbyist is buying them something - yes sir, anything you want sir.

UPDATE
Dillard did NOT quit ALEC
He resigned as Public Sector Chair.
That's it - he resigned as state head honcho.



Wednesday, February 19, 2014

IEA Bankrolls ALECer Dillard. Shame on You.



What's worse than a republican?  
An ALEC pro-corporate, "free market" loving republican

Meet Kirk Dillard
1994
NEW TASK FORCE CHAIRS
Civil Justice
    ILLINOIS REPRESENTATIVE
    KIRK DILLARD


1996
Civil Justice Task Force
Task Force Chair
    Illinois State Senator Kirk Dillard
Private Sector Chairman
    Victor Schwartz, Crowell & Moring


1996 – ALEC Kudos
Illinois Senator Kirk Dillard sponsored landmark legislation in 1995 that has served as a model for comprehensive tort reform in other states

Tiberi was part of a group of legislators at a focus meeting on tort reform at ALEC's 1995 National Orientation Conference who gathered to listen to Dillard and other experts teach the how-to's of tort reform.

Dillard was truly the trailblazer on the cutting edge

1998
ALEC Task Force
Chairs and Private Sector Chairs
CIVIL JUSTICE
   Senator Kirk Dillard, Illinois
   Victor Schwartz, Esq, Crowell & Moring


ALEC LEADERS IN THE STATES
2005

2007 States and Nation Policy Summit Report
Civil Justice
Illinois State Sen. Kirk Dillard will be discussing Illinois as an example of attempts by the personal injury bar to unreasonably expand liability rules.

Civil Justice Taskforce
2010
2011

Kirk Dillard - ALEC expenses and reimbursements

Report Date Mtg Date Amount Type
Jul-00 May-00  $    575.00 Annual Meeting




1-Jul 1-Apr  $    625.00 Annual Meeting
2-Jan 1-Dec  $    287.75 Conference and Transfer Fee





2-Feb  $   (100.00) Reimbursement - Mileage/Parking




2-Jul 2-Mar  $    625.00 Annual Meeting

2-May  $   (265.00) Meeting Reimbursement

2-Jun  $(2,013.50) Annual Meeting Lodging & Travel

2-Nov  $(2,000.00) Orlando Meeting 2002




4-Feb 3-Apr  $    625.00 Annual Meeting
4-Jul 3-Nov  $    275.00 Winter Meeting




4-Aug 4-Apr  $    775.00 Annual Meeting

4-Jul  $   (417.00) Meeting Reimbursement




5-Jul 5-Jun  $ 1,450.00 Annual Meeting

5-Aug  $(1,000.00) Meeting Reimbursement - Dallas

5-Oct  $(2,000.00) Meeting Reimbursement - Dallas




6-Aug 6-Jan  $    100.00 Two Year Membership
6-Aug 6-Apr  $    750.00 Conference Refistration
7-Jan 6-Oct  $    275.00 Conference Fees

2006  $(1,897.28) ALECExposed Junkets - Meeting Scholarship








7-Jul 7-Mar  $    100.00 Conference Fees / Dues
7-Jul 7-May  $    250.00 Conference Registration




8-Jul 8-May  $    250.00 Conference Registration
9-Jan 8-Jul  $    750.00 Annual Conference
9-Jan 8-Jul  $    300.00 Dues
9-Jan 8-Dec  $    300.00 Conference Fees

2008  $(1,835.20) ALECExposed Junkets - Meeting Scholarship




10-Jan 9-May  $    350.00 Conference Registration
10-Jan 9-Jul  $    950.00 Annual Conference




10-Jul 10-May  $    510.00 Conference Fees
11-Jan 10-Aug  $    650.00 Conference Fees




12-Aug 11-Aug  $    175.00 Conference Fees
12-Aug 11-Sep  $    100.00 Fee




12-Aug 12-Jun  $    625.00 Meeting Registration




13-Apr 13-Jan  $    250.00 Dues
13-Apr 13-Feb  $    150.00 Meeting Registration
13-Oct 13-May  $    625.00 Registration


Meet Kirk Dillard 
Why was it necessary for you to meet Kirk Dillard?
Well - because of a story that I read this last week.

A union - the Illinois Education Association - endorsing ALECer Kirk Dillard.
The IEA recommendation of Sen. Kirk Dillard for the Republican nomination for governor has made big news statewide.

The outcome of the Democratic Primary for governor is not in question. We can make a difference in the Republican race if our members, Republicans, Democrats and Independents, vote for Kirk Dillard.

The recommendation of Sen. Dillard is only for the Primary.
So the IEA - which evidently had sh#tloads of money and lots of lots of extra people to put feet to the ground - is backing an ALECer.
And vote for him - yes! vote for an ALECer.  They are so pro-union.
If you are going to vote Republican - vote for an ALECer - hell yes!
What a crock!
Is Sen. Dillard a member of ALEC?

No. ALEC is notoriously slow to remove legislators from their roster, but Sen. Dillard resigned from ALEC last year. We’ve seen his letter of resignation. We have spoken frankly with him about ALEC and the group’s education work. Sen. Dillard told us that his emphasis while serving as ALEC Illinois Chair was on pro-business legislation, not education.
Bullshit!
Bullshit!
Bullshit!
Bullshit!
    Quit just in time to run for the governors race?
    Member since 1994
    Been more active in the last 5 years than ever before
Bullshit!
    ALEC updated their state chairs webpage on February 4th.
    Dillards name is still on the state chair webpage
    Is Dillard calling the ALEC staff - sloths?
Bullshit!
    If he's not an ALECer anymore - will he be introducing legislation
       to repeal evil ALEC legislation.
Bullshit!
    He's pro-business - - have any of you yahoo's over at IEA heard the phrase
        privatization of education?
UPDATE - next day
Dillard did NOT quit ALEC
He resigned as Public Sector Chair.
That's it - he resigned as state head honcho.
Told ya it was bullsht.
The sad part of this f#cking fiasco is that:
    ALEC wants to destroy the unions because they back Dems.
ALEC is doing the nuclear option on unions across the US
and a union is endorsing an ALEC member.
    ALEC better change that song and dance - cause
The IEA, which represents teachers outside Chicago, endorsed Dillard for governor four years ago, but he came up short by 193 votes to state Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington. The union gave Dillard’s campaign $250,000 along with a cadre of political foot soldiers.
Dillard voted against the state’s new law changing Illinois’ public employee pensions, a measure that aims to close a $100 billion unfunded liability within the next 30 years. The endorsement is a setback for state Treasurer Dan Rutherford, who also opposed the new law and contended unions should have had a voice in drafting a reform bill.
A quarter of a million dollars - on a loser
Are you kidding me?
Boots on the ground - for a loser
Are you kidding me?

Then why isn't IEA endoring and bank-rolling Rutherford - if they are supposedly funding a loser - or maybe they think he might win.

IEA claims they back both Republican and Democratic candidates.
ALEC is doing the nuclear option on unions across the US
If the unions keep this up - I'll be a supporter of the American Legislative Exchange Council vile Paycheck Protection Act.

When it comes to Republicans:

What's worse than a republican?  
An ALEC pro-corporate, "free market" loving republican

ALEC 1995-State Sovereignty: The Next American Revolution

Really makes you wonder who was invited to this meeting
AND if they are still on the path of destruction


National Leadership Summit
Three Days
To plan the Next Revolution?

The American Legislative Exchange Council - pure evil - creating a path of destruction for US politics since their first meeting.

ALEC legislators are delusional and 
must be removed from office 
- by your vote!
#VoteNo2ALEC

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Jesse Helms on the Convening of ALEC Meeting #1



AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL TO MEET IN CHICAGO THIS MONTH HON. JESSE A. HELMS OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES Friday. August 2, 1974 Mr. HELMS.

Mr. President, later this month a bipartisan group of conservative State legislators from across the country will meet in Chicago at a conference of the newly formed American Legislative Exchange Council- These legislators are uniting to try to reverse the trend toward greater and greater centralization of power in Washington. They will try to revitalize our Federal system by strengthening State government. The Federal Government, in their view, and mine, is not only too far re- moved from—and insensitive to—the problems of education, taxation, welfare reform, crime, et al.; these legislators are convinced, and I agree, that the Federal Government is the cause, all too often, of the very problems which the States are called upon to solve. Worse, Federal bureaucracy too often discourages action by the States and local governments. But reversing the present flow of authority and power toward Washington, D.C., will not likely be accomplished by action at the Federal level. It is the exception, rather than the rule, when any level of government readily relinquishes even a part of its authority. It is demonstrable that governmental powers have a momentum all their own. Thomas Jefferson is credited with the precept that the government is best which governs least. I wholeheartedly concur. I do not believe that the cradle- to-grave paternalism of the modem welfare state was in the minds of our Founding Fathers when they conceived the American Republic. It is not from lack of compassion that conservatives favor limited government, but from the deep-seated fear of the abuse of power. Surely, in this century, that fear has been borne out. It is no cliche to say that a government big enough to give us any- thing we want is big enough to take away everything we have.

Therefore, it seems obvious that decentralization of government is the most fundamental and urgent task before us today. If ever reform was needed in our public institutions, it is now; and the way to achieve it is by the reversal of the trend toward big brother government.

Through a conservative legislative initiative, the American Legislative Ex- change Council hopes to galvanize our State governments into reclaiming for themselves the prerogatives and responsibilities that were once theirs. This type of initiative and enthusiasm is sorely needed at the State and local level to keep our Republic from sinking into the swamps of economic and moral stagnation. I wish these fine State legislators every success.

Mr. President. I ask unanimous con- sent that the “Statement of Purpose” of the American Legislative Exchange Council be presented in the Extensions of Remarks.

There being no objection, the Statement of Purpose was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows: American Legislative Exchange Council Statement of Purpose

We, as conservative legislators, believe that the unique American Federal system re- quires close cooperation and consultation among Members of Legislatures In the several States, and Members of Congress. That belief springs from a conservative philosophical premise that nothing should be undertaken by a higher echelon of government which can be accomplished by a lower echelon and that individual freedom demands strict limitations on the power of all levels of government.

We further believe that State governments are vital to the continued success of our Federal Union and that the genius of our Constitution is summed up in the primary clause which delegates residual powers to the States and to the people in those spheres not specifically delegated to the national government.

We therefore establish the American Legislative Exchange Council:
1. To assist conservative legislators In the States and In the Congress by sharing re- search information and staff support facilities.
2. To establish a clearinghouse for conservative bills at the State legislature level and to provide for a bill exchange program.
3. To disseminate model conservative legislation In all fifty State legislatures and among several thousand legislators. Also, to promote the introduction of companion bills in Congress and in the States, including resolutions on amendments to the Constitution and State resolutions which memorialize the Congress to act in specific areas.
4. To improve communication between conservative State legislators and Members of Congress.
5. To formulate conservative action pro- grams and legislative initiatives which will help to promote federalism by strengthening the position of State governments and to define conservative positions on intergovernmental relations.

Sunday, February 16, 2014

ALEC Yanks the Chain of Another Media Source



A newspaper gave ALEC a pass when evidently ALEC rebutted an editorial.
The newspaper didn't question it - just posted it - which is a disservice to everyone who read that newspaper.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease and evidently can distort the truth in anyway they want to get exposure.

Doesn't take an idiot to read thru this
- but for those of you that are RW idiots or ALEC members
- lets clear this up for you.

The papers clarification 
An editorial Tuesday stated that the American Legislative Exchange Council is behind the effort to enact state laws that require welfare applicants to be tested for drug use, such as House Bill 1351, recently passed by the Indiana House.
An "editorial" is an opinion piece.
Evidently ALEC has to cover its back now -  even when people are only opining about them.
This is a really good sign that ALEC is possibly in really big trouble when it comes to ALEC pushing legislation the way they do and have done for decades..
According to Molly Fuhs, the organization’s manager of communications and media relations, the organization pushing that legislative concept is actually the Foundation for Government Accountability, a Naples, Fla.-based nonprofit advocacy group whose president, Tarren Bragdon, spoke on the benefits of Florida’s drug-testing law at an ALEC seminar in 2011. Christine Herrera, then director of ALEC’s Health and Human Services Task Force, was quoted by the FGA as endorsing the drug-testing-bill concept. Herrera is now senior fellow for the FGA.
Interesting thing here is again we have Molly Fuhrs speaking on behalf of ALEC - been awhile since PR Poobah Meierling has taken the reins to kill bad publicity.  Are things going sour for him at ALEC?

Foundation for Government Accountability - a right wing think tank.
Offered the legislation to ALEC legislators at an ALEC meeting in November of 2011.  Copy /paste bill mill legislation which ALEC is famous for.
ALEC didn't stop it - ALEC pushed it to their legislative members.
And -  Christine Herrera, then director of ALEC’s Health and Human Services Task Force - ENDORSED it to the ALEC legislative members.

What in the hell did ALEC think their ALEC legislative members were going to do with legislation introduced at an ALEC meeting and endorsed by the director of the HHS committee - forgetabout it?  Don't think so.
ALEC headquarters is  a bunch of a$$wipes.
ALEC legislators are just a bunch of evil nastiness.

Oh, BTW -
Christie Herrera is senior fellow at the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA).
No longer at ALEC - musta been a good meeting in November 2011.

ALEC got caught
ALEC doesn't like getting caught
ALEC “does not have any model policies – nor ever did – relating to drug testing of welfare recipients,” Fuhs said. The concept is “not something that we support or advocate.”
ALEC distorts the truth to the media - cause they can get away with it.
The mainstream media is too damn dumb to realize ALEC is yanking their chain.

The moral of the story is
ALEC the IT doesn't do a thing

Legislators who belong to the American Legislative Exchange Council are totally responsible for the evil legislation 
that is spreading across the US.
ALEC legislators MUST be removed from office.
#VoteNo2ALEC

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Will KC ALEC Protest - Be A Closed Shop Event?

I can't help wondering if the folks in Missouri are going to have an open house party for the Kansas City ALEC meeting in May - or a closed shop party for the ALEC meeting in May.

Why would I wonder that?
Well for the ALEC meeting in December - the notice for the protest went out two days in advance of the protest.

Coming from out of state - I couldn't drop everything and be in Washington DC in two days.
Coming from out of state - I couldn't justify flying into Washington DC and hoping someone had planned to do a protest.
It was a closed shop protest.

I can't help thinking that the people who are currently controlling the dialogue about ALEC  - only want their people around - they want to carefully control the messaging of the protestors.

I don't think they want the independents involved.
I don't think they want the kids involved, or their voices heard - all that yelling and shouting and pushing doesn't look good on camera.  ( I enjoy being with the kids and blackshirts, but that's just me - I use to be one of them, I cherish their passion.)
I don't think they want anyone involved that doesn't fit their image of what they want an ALEC protestor to look like.

And they control who is there at the protest - when they only pre-advertise the protest to "their" people.

When there is an ALEC protest
   We need voices,  lots of voices - different voices.
   We need faces,  lots of faces - different faces.
We need to let the American Legislative Exchange Council know that a lot of different people are not okay with our legislators being ALEC members.

Democracy in action?

A closed shop protest?
This is not what Democracy looks like.