Why Isn't ALEC Bragging About Their Part in the XL Pipeline?
Why?
They hide behind blogs written on an ALEC supported webpage - but they don't have the guts to come out and state that ALEC state legislators at the state and federal level are helping move the XL Pipeline along.
Bunch of cowards - hiding in the shadows.
A one paragraph snip – if you want to read the whole thing –
go find it – I’m not going to link to it.
Alberta Bound: Observations from the Canadian Oil SandsALEC Blog Team | April 3, 2013 | Add a commentAlberta Bound: Observations from the Canadian Oil SandsBy the Honorable John Piscopo, CT (HD-76)ALEC National ChairLike everyone else, I had heard about the vast reserves of crude oil in Canada called the “Oil Sands,” so I jumped at the chance when given the opportunity to tour and learn more about them. I flew to Calgary in the Province of Alberta, where my first impression of the people was a genuine friendliness in the midst of a city experiencing dramatic and rapid growth. Our small group of nine ALEC member legislators and ALEC’s International Relations Task Force Director met in the hotel lobby and walked from there to our first stop at the headquarters of pipeline manufacturer and operator, TransCanada, to learn about the pipeline itself. Company representatives gave us a quick overview of the company, its products, and safety procedures stressing their exemplary safety track record. They are responsible for pipelines that already go the distance through Canada, and much of the US. To say I was impressed is an understatement.
Who paid for that trip?
ALEC Corporate member TransCanada?
The one thing that has puzzled me is
Why isn’t the American Legislative Exchange Council
acknowledging their part in the XL Pipeline, publicly – braying about their
success to this point?
After all
ALEC Boasts that it has
2,000 state legislators
that support ALEC policy
96 members of the US
Congress that support ALEC policy
ALEC DOES NOT BOAST ABOUT
the number of other state federal officials
who support ALEC policy
which could be a major issue for America.
From the Common Cause documents
July 2010
ALEC
Natural Resources Task Force Member
Beth Jensen
Private Sector Member (M1)
Manager, Government Relations
TransCanada
13710 FNB
Parkway
Omaha, NE 68154
Phone: 402.492.3400 FAX: 402.492.7491
Then in
November of 2011
Resolution
in Support of the Keystone 1 XL Pipeline BE IT RESOLVED BY THE [INSERT
LEGISLATIVE BODY] OF THE STATE OF [INSERT
STATE]:
WHEREAS,
The United States relies – and will continue to rely for many years – on
gasoline, diesel and jet fuel despite the recent focus on renewable and
alternative sources of energy. In order to fuel our economy, the United States
will need more oil and natural gas while also requiring additional alternative
energy sources such as ethanol and other renewable energy sources; and
WHEREAS,
The United States currently depends on foreign imports for more than half of
our petroleum usage. As the largest consumer of petroleum in the world, our
dependence on overseas oil has created difficult geopolitical relationships
with damaging consequences for our national security; and
WHEREAS,
oil shale deposits in the Bakken Reserves in Montana and North Dakota and South
Dakota are an increasingly important crude oil resource, with an estimated 11
billion barrels of recoverable crude oil, and there is not enough pipeline
capacity for crude oil supplies from Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota,
Oklahoma and Texas to American refineries; and
WHEREAS,
Canadian oil reserves contain an estimated 173 billion barrels of recoverable
oil. Canada is the single
largest supplier of oil to the United
States at 2.62 million barrels per day and
has the capacity to significantly increase that rate; and 7
WHEREAS,
the Keystone XL pipeline will, when completed, carry 700,000 barrels of North
American oil to American refineries in the Gulf Coast region and construction
of the project will create 120,000 jobs nationwide, create $20 billion in
economic growth and generate millions of dollars worth of government receipts;
and
WHEREAS,
A recent study by the U.S. Department of Energy found that increasing delivery
to American refineries from Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Alberta, as
well as Texas and Oklahoma to American refineries has the potential to
substantially reduce our country's dependency on sources outside of North
America; and
WHEREAS,
Canada sends more than 99% of its oil exports to the United States, the bulk of
which goes to Midwestern refineries. Oil companies are investing huge sums to
expand and upgrade refineries in the Midwest
and elsewhere to make gasoline and other refined products from Canadian oil
derived from oil sands. The expansion and upgrade projects will create many new
construction jobs over the next five years and, in [INSERT STATE],
substantially add to our state's gross state product; and
WHEREAS,
The same money used to buy North American oil will likely later be spent
directly on U.S.
goods and services in contrast with the money sent to hostile oil-producing
governments that is later used to further anti-democratic agendas. Supporting
the continued shift towards reliable and secure sources of North American oil
is of vital interest to the United States
and the state of [INSERT
STATE].
NOW
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That we, the members of the [INSERT LEGISLATIVE BODY]
of the state of [INSERT STATE], support continued and increased development and
delivery of oil derived from North American oil reserves to American
refineries, urge Congress to support that continued and increased development
and delivery, and urge Congress to ask the U.S. Secretary of State to approve
the Keystone XL pipeline project that has been awaiting a presidential permit
since 2008 to reduce dependence on unstable governments, improve our national
security, and strengthen ties with an important ally; and
BE IT
FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Clerk of the [INSERT STATE LEGISLATIVE BODY]
transmit duly authenticated copies of this resolution to the Speaker and Clerk
of the United States House of Representatives, to the President Pro Tempore and
Secretary of the United States Senate, to the members of the [INSERT STATE]
Congressional delegation, and to the news media of [INSERT STATE].
ALEC Boasts that it has
2,000 state legislators that support ALEC policy - which
would include the ALEC policy on the XL pipeline
96 members of the US
Congress that support ALEC policy - which would include the ALEC policy on the
XL pipeline
ALEC DOES NOT BOAST ABOUT
The number of other state federal officials
who support ALEC policy
which could be a major issue for America.
And then you have this post on the same ALEC blogsite
The Keystone XL – Excuses for Inaction Are Disappearing FastIt’s time for the President to approve the Keystone XL Project thus taking advantage of an opportunity that will create American jobs, enhance U.S. energy security, have minimal environmental impact along its route and avoid unnecessarily straining U.S.-Canada Relations.
Don’t know
who/what ALEC is?
It is time
you did!!!
For lots of
info about the American Legislative Exchange Council
check out
this webpage
No comments:
Post a Comment