This bit – grab my attention yesterday in an interview on
Democracy Now:
Now, Mitt Romney, on the other
hand, I think in a sense of wanting to really show his military might without
having the service, would increase the military budget by nearly $8 trillion
over the next 10 years, without really any explanation for what that funding
would go for, other than of course maybe some of the bellicose comments he’s
making about Iran.
That 8 trillion dollar “increase” quote is not shared by
all the media reporting – but it makes a great statement to start the post and
grab attention.
May 2012: Compared to the Pentagon's current budget,
Romney's plan would lead to $2.1 trillion in additional spending over the next
ten years,
According to those principles,
Romney would increase defense spending to $7.9 trillion
between 2013 and 2022, says the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. By
comparison, Ryan would spend $5.7 trillion on core defense over the same
period—only 72 percent of what Romney wants to spend.
And how will some those trillions of dollars in military
be spent?
Romney: I do not anticipate those savings will be
able to be used to reduce the deficit but instead will be necessary to increase the number of active-duty
personnel by approximately 100,000,
I wonder if that includes the reimplementation of the
draft?
Why would Romney need to increase active duty by
approximately 100,000?????
Well……
At a meeting with Israeli leaders in Jerusalem, the US defence secretary, Leon Panetta, says Washington will do
all it can to prevent Iran developing a nuclear weapon. But Israel's prime
minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, warns time for peaceful resolution is running
out.
Ya, so..............
In a telling exchange during a
debate in December, Mr. Romney criticized Mr. Gingrich for making a disparaging
remark about Palestinians, declaring: “Before I made a statement of that
nature, I’d get on the phone to my friend Bibi Netanyahu and say: ‘Would it
help if I say this? What would you like me to do?’ “
"What would you like me to do?"
Is that a $10,000 bet?
Or a 100,000 bet?
Really???????
REALLY?????
Martin S. Indyk, a United States
ambassador to Israel in the Clinton administration, said that whether
intentional or not, Mr. Romney’s statement implied that he would “subcontract
Middle East policy to Israel.”
“That, of course, would be
inappropriate,” he added.
But would Romney really get on the phone to his friend Netanhayu?
Really - or is that just an exaggeration?
Really - you betcha!!!!
A few years later, Mr. Romney had
dinner with Mr. Netanyahu at a private home in the Jewish quarter of the Old
City, in central Jerusalem, where the two spent hours discussing the American
and Israeli economies. When Mr. Netanyahu informed Mr. Romney of a personal
campaign to persuade American pension funds to divest from businesses tied to
Iran, Mr. Romney offered up his Rolodex.
Before he left Israel, Mr. Romney
set up several meetings with government officials in the United States for his
old colleague. “I immediately saw the wisdom of his thinking,” Mr. Romney said.
Back in Massachusetts, Mr. Romney
sent out letters to legislators requesting that the public pension funds they
controlled sell off investments from corporations doing business with Iran.
You see Romney and Netanyahu are old friends as noted in
the New York times article “A Friendship Dating to 1976 Resonates in 2012” that
the above quote is taken from
Be afraid people – be very afraid.
Be vigilant and aware - people
Romney was asked about the
Fly/Kristol article on Face the Nation on Sunday. He responded:
I can assure you if I'm President, the
Iranians will have no question but that I would be willing to take military
action, if necessary, to prevent them from becoming a nuclear threat to the
world. I don't believe at this stage, therefore, if I'm President, that we need
to have war powers approval or a special authorization for military force. The
President has that capacity now.
It’s worth pausing a moment to
consider the magnitude of this statement. Romney is saying that he doesn’t need
Congressional approval for a US attack on Iran.
Mitt Romney, on the other hand, I think in a sense
of wanting to really show his military might
without having the service,
of wanting to really show his military might
without having the service,
Romney – another Bush Jr.
Machismo – by bombs.
Be vigilant and aware - people
Be afraid people – be very afraid.
I for one was frightened by Mr. Romneys harsh ending comments to his speech at the RNC. Hopefully it wasn't his words, but frankly, that's besides the point. What the rest of the world needs to hear right now is not Jingoist rhetoric, regardless of its truth value, because it just sends a frightening image, and will end up hurting our relationship with our allies and weakening ties that have been slowly built over the last two years.While I remain neutral on who I support, after years of draining war's, Obama's plan, of building up power with soft diplomacy seems the better option. Besides, our troops are starting to come home, and now is less the time then ever then to send them back out on another foreign front.
ReplyDelete