This post has been brewing for a couple of days. It's kind of a tale of woe and one that makes me think - I need to put my legislators office tele number on speed dial for the upcoming session (he's an ALEC wannabe).
First, I heard the amazing Tony Trupiano from MI on a repeat
of the Ed Show this week and he was talking about what happened in MI earlier
this month. During that interview which
was done while Trupiano was at the MI capitol with the protestors – Trupiano mentioned
some statistics from MI that I found intriguing, noting that the statistics
came from a very reputable firm..
Our Company
EPIC·MRA is a highly-regarded and
experienced survey research firm located in Lansing, Michigan.
Although the firm has been conducting business in Michigan since 1985, the
principal officers of EPIC·MRA have been active in governmental, political,
marketing, business and health issues at the state and national levels for over
30 years.
EPIC·MRA, the most quoted polling
firm in Michigan, is regularly cited by national news and media outlets and has
been featured on CNN, ABC World News Tonight, ABC's Nightline, and National
Public Radio.
And one piece of their research included this:
12/04/2012
Frequency Report
EPIC▪MRA STATEWIDE POLL OF ACTIVE
GENERAL ELECTION VOTERS
[FREQUENCY REPORT OF SURVEY RESPONSES
– 600 SAMPLE – ERROR ±4.0%]
Polling Dates: November 27ththrough
November 29th, 2012
Thinking about the lame-duck session of the outgoing
Michigan Legislature that will be held in the next few weeks in December, which
of the following actions do you think should be the top priority for the
Michigan Legislature during the lame-duck session? [ROTATE 1 TO 5]
50%
|
Pass laws that would create jobs
|
21%
|
Pass only necessary bills, with nothing controversial,
since many lawmakers are leaving
|
15%
|
Pass laws that would improve education
|
6%
|
Pass laws to make Michigan
a “right-to-work” state
|
5%
|
Pass laws that would dramatically change how public
education is funded
|
3%
|
Pass laws that would eliminate or reduce taxes paid by
businesses
|
---
|
Undecided/Refused
|
How familiar are you with what is referred to as Right to
Work Laws – very familiar, somewhat familiar, only a little familiar, or not
familiar at all?
Dec ’12
|
Jun ‘07
|
|
25%
|
Very familiar
|
15%
|
43%
|
Somewhat familiar
|
37%
|
68%
|
TOTAL FAMILIAR
|
52%
|
17%
|
Only a little familiar
|
17%
|
15%
|
Not familiar at all
|
27%
|
32%
|
TOTAL NOT FAMILIAR
|
44%
|
Michiganders wanted
this
50%
|
Pass laws that would create jobs
|
And this
15%
|
Pass laws that would improve education
|
And they got this
6%
|
Pass laws to make Michigan
a “right-to-work” state
|
The ALEC Connection (gotta be one if I'm writing this, right?)
Some snips from an article in the Oct 2007 edition of Inside ALEC – (written
by Michael Hough – who is a Maryland State Legislator AND works for ALEC)
A Tale of Two States:
Iowa
vs. Michigan
In Michigan, many lawmakers and business leaders
are beginning to see that forced unionism laws have made the state less
competitive in today’s global economy and hurt businesses in their state.
Lawmakers in Iowa
should look to Michigan
to see that when unions gain monopoly bargaining power they begin to serve as
an albatross around the neck of a state’s economy.
In Michigan
and Iowa,
political leaders who respect the rights of workers to join or not join a labor
union and who care about the vitality of their states’ economies should reject
forced unionism laws and make sure their state has a right-to-work law.
ALEC wanted this
“make sure their state has a right-to-work
law”
And on DECEMBER 11
Michiganders got this
Gov. Snyder Signs Both Michigan 'Right to Work' for Less Bills
I can’t repeat enough
times
Who does your
legislator REALLY represent?
Have you programmed your speed dial yet? - You may need it this year.
No comments:
Post a Comment